I've been alluding to this cruise for a while. However, for purposes of safety, I didn't want to start talking about it until I returned.
- - - - - -
When we booked this cruise, I was thinking of how RQS and I could spend some time together in a warm climate, while I presented as Marian for a few days. Over time, we settled on the above 10 day cruise. But the idea of me spending time as Marian went by the wayside, as I couldn't get information from the DR regarding whether I'd have problems with a gender presentation which conflicts with my legal ID. In addition, we had a snowstorm the weekend before we left, followed by sub freezing temperatures until the day we were to board the ship.
After the holiday season, the thing I wanted to do most was to hunker down inside for a few months and come out of hibernation when spring comes. Instead, I ended up having to plan for a trip I wasn't completely excited about taking. About the only thing that interested me about this trip was the possibility of visiting historic sites in San Juan, something which was impossible when I made port there on an NCL cruise which arrived after 4 pm.
As I've mentioned in this and my other blog, I am not a fan of cruise lines "hot docking" their ships, so that multiple ships can be in port on the same day. I feel that this is a disservice to cruisers, as one is often unable to have a chance to properly enjoy a port. In fact, I chose an Alaska cruise with one of my criteria being whether the ship spent a full day in each of the Alaskan ports where the ship docked. Our January cruise does not "hot dock" at any of its ports, but it will spend 6 days at sea (including Embarkation day) on a 10-day cruise. We made a trade-off to have full port days and extra days at sea to have our 10-day getaway.
Given that we are sailing on MSC in a sub-optimal inside cabin below the entrance to the buffet, I expect that we'll have to deal with noise coming from the deck above. Neither RQS nor I are impressed by the quality of MSC's entertainment. Yet, it is good enough for us to have considered sailing the line again. The same goes for the food. Unlike what we got used to on Princess and NCL, MSC's specialty dinner package offerings do not give the same bang per buck. On this trip, we opted NOT to buy specialty meal packages in advance and to enjoy the food served in the main dining room, with the possible exception of going to the on-board taco joint..
MSC is a line known for low priced cruising. It also has some of the most reasonably priced shore excursions compared with similar excursions offered by NCL Both RQS and I feel that NCL's excursions have been excessively marked up by the cruise line. Contrast this with MSC, where we get good excursions at a very reasonable price. On our past Bermuda cruises, NCL was charging $140 for a tour that visited the Crystal Caves, while MSC charged $80 for a similar experience. (I may be comparing apples to pears here, as NCL offered an extra stop on its tour.) Yes, MSC does a quite bit of nickel-diming, but in general one will get decent value for money spent.
While I'm cruising, I'll be writing posts about the cruise that you'll be seeing here over the next few days. Hopefully, you will enjoy our exploits. One thing I am certain to do will be to ask the people at the pier whether "My Sister" (as I refer to myself when presenting as Mario) will have trouble at the port if she presents as Marian, but presents Mario's ID. (It worked in Bermuda, why not elsewhere?)